The message of the Occupy Wall Street protesters is indiscernible.
The message is messages; cries for “Fiscal Responsibility,” and calling for the end of “Corporate corruption in Washington;” too much for too little time.
The Occupy Wall Street campaign is a hell-bent grassroots effort for socioeconomic and political change.
The motives are good, but what change (changes?) the protesters want is questionable. The Occupy Wall Street protesters are just as disillusioned and disorganized as the institutions they are protesting against.
Their message is just as discombobulated as the media coverage they are receiving. The New York Times is apparently just as confused as the protest they are covering.
While covering the protesters march onto the Brooklyn Bridge in New York City, the New York
Times flipped more than the GOP candidates discussing Medicare on how they felt about the protesters – all in the span 20 minutes.
At 6:59 p.m. the New York Times ran the headline “Protestors Arrested on Brooklyn Bridge.”
Twenty minutes later at 7:19 p.m. the headline was changed to read “Hundreds arrested on Brooklyn Bridge.”
Where the shift in blame from the police to the protesters is prevalent is in the lead change that occurs when the headline is changed.
The first lead read: “After allowing them onto the bridge, the police cut off and arrested dozens of Occupy Wall Street demonstrators.”
The second and changed lead read: “In a tense showdown over the East River, police arrested hundreds of Occupy Wall Street demonstrators after they marched onto the bridge’s Brooklyn bound roadway.”
Do dozens change to hundreds and allowed change to marched in the span of 20 minutes?
The protesters voice is lost because of such flip-flopped media coverage from many sources. In the late 1960s the media displayed the civil war and anti-war protestors as a youthful, self-disenfranchised group of extreme leftists and drug induced hippies, tainting the message, power, and legitimacy of the protests and protesters themselves.
Media coverage of what is happening on Wall Street displays the protestors as a youthful, self-disenfranchised group of extreme leftists and drug induced hippies, tainting the message, power, and legitimacy of the protests; even if their makeup is from all walks of the socioeconomic life style.
The protesters message may not be a cry for a change in everything, but if their one voice cannot be conveyed through the media outlets that are reporting on them, then their voices will never be heard.